<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Real Political</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realpolitical.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realpolitical.net</link>
	<description>Political theater, stage left</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>RP Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/rp-roundup-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/rp-roundup-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[RP Roundup]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[diane feinstein]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hilary clinton]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inauguration tickets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The “Bitch” and the “Ditz”
For those who felt awkward about the way people were more than glad to attack Sarah Palin&#8217;s shortcomings, NYMag&#8217;s Amanda Fortini offers a keen reading of this year&#8217;s campaign.  The Bitch and The Ditz aptly sums up how the narratives surrounding Hilary Clinton and Palin amplified sexist beliefs.


Obama&#8217;s Clinton Initiative
The New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nymag.com/news/politics/nationalinterest/52184/">The “Bitch” and the “Ditz”</a><br />
For those who felt awkward about the way people were more than glad to attack Sarah Palin&#8217;s shortcomings, NYMag&#8217;s Amanda Fortini offers a keen reading of this year&#8217;s campaign.  The Bitch and The Ditz aptly sums up how the narratives surrounding Hilary Clinton and Palin amplified sexist beliefs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/obamas-clinton-initiative-0"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/obamas-clinton-initiative-0">Obama&#8217;s Clinton Initiative</a></p>
<p>The New York Observer&#8217;s Joe Conason offers an interesting take on rumors that Hilary Clinton may become the next Secretary of State.  Conason suggests that the Clinton family conflicts of interests should take second fiddle to what she (and of course Bill) offer as a statesperson.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/11/scalp-inaugurat.html">Just Don&#8217;t Get Caught</a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re thinking of scalping your inauguration tickets, ABC News&#8217; Political Radar blog reports that Diane Feinstein may send the feds after you.  It appears as if there&#8217;s move to crack down on prospective ticket hawkers.  We&#8217;ll see how that plays out now won&#8217;t we.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/rp-roundup-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RP Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/rp-roundup-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/rp-roundup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[RP Roundup]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bobby jindal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[eric cantor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mike huckabee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Huffington Post scores a rare tri-fecta providing all three items for today&#8217;s RP Roundup.  GOP operatives continue putting their party on blast and HuffPo managed to isolate choice quotes from three of the party&#8217;s emerging stars.  Clink on the links to read the full story&#8230;
Bobby Jindal: Something is Wrong Republican Party
We have got to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post scores a rare tri-fecta providing all three items for today&#8217;s RP Roundup.  GOP operatives continue putting their party on blast and HuffPo managed to isolate choice quotes from three of the party&#8217;s emerging stars.  Clink on the links to read the full story&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/16/bobby-jindal-something-is_n_144199.html">Bobby Jindal: Something is Wrong Republican Party</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/16/bobby-jindal-something-is_n_144199.html"></a>We have got to stop defending the kind of spending and out-of-control spending that we would never tolerate in the other side.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/17/incoming-house-gop-leader_n_144301.html">Eric Cantor: GOP is No Longer Relevant</a></p>
<p>Where we have really fallen down is, we have lacked the ability to be relevant to people&#8217;s lives. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/17/huckabee-settles-scores-w_n_144325.html">Mike Huckabee Throws D&#8217;em Bows</a></p>
<p>&#8220;His amazingly lackluster campaign reflected just how disconnected he was with the people&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/rp-roundup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama on 60 Minutes</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/barack-obama-on-60-minutes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/barack-obama-on-60-minutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[60 minutes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Kroft&#8217;s Interview with Barack and Michelle Obama
Watch CBS Videos Online
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Kroft&#8217;s Interview with Barack and Michelle Obama<br />
<embed src='http://www.cbs.com/thunder/swf30can10cbsnews/rcpHolderCbs-3-4x3.swf' FlashVars='link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ecbsnews%2Ecom%2Fvideo%2Fwatch%2F%3Fid%3D4608198n&#038;partner=news&#038;vert=News&#038;autoPlayVid=false&#038;releaseURL=http://release.theplatform.com/content.select?pid=BNXr0JrnQThBYSfHRHXiiZYcUC2nQXqQ&#038;name=cbsPlayer&#038;allowScriptAccess=always&#038;wmode=transparent&#038;embedded=y&#038;scale=noscale&#038;rv=n&#038;salign=tl' allowFullScreen='true' width='425' height='324' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed><br/><a href='http://www.cbs.com'>Watch CBS Videos Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/barack-obama-on-60-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Crisis at GM</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/the-crisis-at-gm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/the-crisis-at-gm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scores of people came out on town squares all across the country on Saturday to prostest California&#8217;s decision to revoke Proposition 8: the ballot measure that decided the fate of same-sex marriages in the state.  While far less in number, the Sunday news shows featured a formidable procession of commentators addressing the current crisis at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scores of people came out on town squares all across the country on Saturday to prostest California&#8217;s decision to revoke Proposition 8: the ballot measure that decided the fate of same-sex marriages in the state.  While far less in number, the Sunday news shows featured a formidable procession of commentators addressing the current crisis at General Motors.  In short, should the government bailout GM&#8211;even if it will cost taxpayers 25billion dollars&#8211;or should the automotive powerhouse be left to die like a raisin in the sun?</p>
<p>25billion is no paltry sum, nor is 300,000, the number for how many jobs would be lost if GM were allowed to collapse.</p>
<p>This entire scenario reads like a high stakes version of that icebreaker game when your co-worker falls back and you catch them.</p>
<p>It now remains to be seen whether Americans are primed to catch their brethren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/the-crisis-at-gm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Do We Do With Lieberman?</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/what-do-we-do-with-lieberman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/what-do-we-do-with-lieberman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[joe lieberman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rachel maddow]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[raising kaine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Democrats continue getting their house in order&#8211;pun intended&#8211;one of the most vexing questions that the party faces is what to do with Joe Lieberman.  Lieberman who as recently as 2000 was the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, and on whose behalf Barack Obama campaigned in 2006, was extremely critical of Obama during this year&#8217;s presidential race.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Democrats continue getting their house in order&#8211;pun intended&#8211;one of the most vexing questions that the party faces is what to do with Joe Lieberman.  Lieberman who as recently as 2000 was the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, and on whose behalf Barack Obama campaigned in 2006, was extremely critical of Obama during this year&#8217;s presidential race.  While stumping for his longtime friend John McCain Lieberman went as far to say on a number of occasions that he was afraid of an Obama presidency.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nnKh3N5Vgy4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nnKh3N5Vgy4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
The issue for Democrats is that they have a slim majority over Republicans in the senate and therefore, at least on paper, it seems to make sense to keep Lieberman in their caucus, even if that means potentially allowing him to keep his chairmanship over the Homeland Security committee.</p>
<p>Last week Rachel Maddow issued a commentary declaring that &#8220;Joe Must Go!&#8221;  <a href="http://raisingkaine.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=17236">RaisingKaine</a> followed Maddow&#8217;s commentary with this clip from <a href="http://raisingkaine.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=17236">Byron Dorgan</a>.</p>
<p>Should the Democrats grow a pair as Maddow suggests and let Joe go, or should they keep him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/11/what-do-we-do-with-lieberman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Penn Debunks Sarah Palin&#8217;s Baby Mama Drama</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/09/dallas-penn-debunks-sarah-palins-baby-mama-drama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/09/dallas-penn-debunks-sarah-palins-baby-mama-drama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dallas penn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gAU5AaAhpA4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gAU5AaAhpA4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/09/dallas-penn-debunks-sarah-palins-baby-mama-drama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our National Conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/09/our-national-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/09/our-national-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[national conversation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Gustav hitting the coast, the Republicans postponing the start of their convention, and pundits grousing over McCain&#8217;s vice-presidential selection, it is worth it to take a moment to step back and consider what has become of &#8220;our national conversation.&#8221;  First, one must ask who is facilitating this conversation. As a mix of bloggers, bloviators, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Gustav hitting the coast, the Republicans postponing the start of their convention, and pundits grousing over McCain&#8217;s vice-presidential selection, it is worth it to take a moment to step back and consider what has become of &#8220;our national conversation.&#8221;  First, one must ask who is facilitating this conversation. As a mix of bloggers, bloviators, broadcasters, commentators and journalists proliferate our airwaves we are as likely to be hearing the same thing over and over again (normally the things that we like hearing) without any clear end goal.  Second, without a clear facilitator it makes sense that few of us ever really know what precisely is being discussed.  This is not so much a result of any ignorance on our part with the issues themselves, but rather it&#8217;s that far too many of us have been convinced to think that certain things are non-issues.  We can not move the conversation forward because we remain steadfast in our belief that the opposing side does not have a point, which of course suggests that the conversation in itself may be pointless.</p>
<p>As we continue casting votes with our remotes in preparation of casting our ballots, it&#8217;s well worth remembering that what happens now goes well beyond election day.  The person we elect will play a role in not only shaping our foreign and domestic policy, but setting the standard for how we choose to engage each other.  Frighteningly enough, they will likely do this by following our lead.  Therefore it&#8217;s imperative that we learn sooner rather than later, what indeed is &#8220;our national conversation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/09/our-national-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What foreign policy experience?</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/what-foreign-policy-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/what-foreign-policy-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IwWGS73v4_k&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IwWGS73v4_k&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/what-foreign-policy-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m Proud</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/why-im-proud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/why-im-proud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrSingleton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Voters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
.
Obama was just nominated as the presidential candidate for the Democratic party 2008.
As an American and as an African American I am proud, but mostly proud of the American voters who brought this about. Sure I&#8217;m proud of Barack Obama himself but he&#8217;s just done everything I expect of an extraordinarily committed, good and brilliant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.realpolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/proud.jpg" alt="" title="proud" width="480" height="330" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-116" /></p>
<p class="space" style="color: #fff;">.</p>
<p><big>Obama was just nominated as the presidential candidate for the Democratic party 2008.</big></p>
<p>As an American and as an African American I am proud, but mostly proud of the American voters who brought this about. Sure I&#8217;m proud of Barack Obama himself but he&#8217;s just done everything I expect of an extraordinarily committed, good and brilliant public servant. I&#8217;m not at all shocked that he was able to accomplish this as an African American because as an African American myself I know first hand how immeasurably capable we are of achieving greatness just as well as anyone else.</p>
<p>The enormous feat today actually gets credited to the millions of Americans who ignored ignorance and got on board. Obama is brilliant because he is awakening the brilliance of all of the American people.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s more, after this convention week, after we get beyond all the feel-goodiness, let&#8217;s also remember that he has presented a pretty brilliant plan for propelling America full throttle into the global, competitive, technological and green 21st Century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/why-im-proud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now I&#8217;m more nervous</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/now-im-more-nervous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/now-im-more-nervous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrSingleton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m starting to wonder why Senator Obama would choose to deliver his convention speech in a huge open air stadium where security is far more complicated than it would be in a closed space. Of course a stadium fits a larger audience of adored and valued participants but the risk is so severe and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/images/2008/08/26/tharingartrellrmn.jpg' alt='Tharin Gartrell arrested in Denver, suspected of murder plot' align='left' />I&#8217;m starting to wonder why Senator Obama would choose to deliver his convention speech in a huge open air stadium where security is far more complicated than it would be in a closed space. Of course a stadium fits a larger audience of adored and valued participants but the risk is so severe and the stakes are so high. The move reminds me of the danger that Benazir Bhutto put herself in by riding atop a vehicle after she&#8217;d received continuous threats on her life.</p>
<p><a href='http://cbs4denver.com/investigates/assisination.plot.obama.2.802827.html'><img src="http://www.realpolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/cbs4denver.jpg" alt="watch video" title="cbs4denver" width="317" height="370" align="left" /></a>Obviously, what still worries me is that this plot is actually vast and these few men arrested are right in step with the overall plan, they are being put forth as mere scapegoats to distract us all from more people involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/now-im-more-nervous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daddy Yankee Endorses John McCain</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/daddy-yankee-endorses-john-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/daddy-yankee-endorses-john-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bringing new meaning to the term &#8216;dame la gasolina&#8217; Reggaton star Daddy Yankee 	endorsed republican senator John McCain yesterday.  Citing McCain&#8217;s record on immigration as one of the reasons prompting his decision, it would have been just as apt for Daddy Yankee to bring up his and McCain&#8217;s mutual passion for la gasolina for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bringing new meaning to the term &#8216;dame la gasolina&#8217; Reggaton star Daddy Yankee 	<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-mccain26-2008aug26,0,2890500.story">endorsed republican</a> senator John McCain yesterday.  Citing McCain&#8217;s record on immigration as one of the reasons prompting his decision, it would have been just as apt for Daddy Yankee to bring up his and McCain&#8217;s mutual passion for la <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1mqij_daddy-yankee-gasolina_music">gasolina</a> for why he&#8217;s backing McCain, who never minces any words when talking about his support for off-shore drilling.
<div><object width="420" height="336"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/k4zvbPmPrcuRzMbuUb&#038;related=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/k4zvbPmPrcuRzMbuUb&#038;related=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="336" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always"></embed></object><br /><b><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1mqij_daddy-yankee-gasolina_music">Daddy Yankee - Gasolina</a></b><br /><i>Uploaded by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/ginuwine69">ginuwine69</a></i></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/daddy-yankee-endorses-john-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rabid Mad Attack Dog!</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/rabid-mad-attack-dog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/rabid-mad-attack-dog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrSingleton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[joe biden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/v1op8vwF5UA&#038;color1=11645361&#038;color2=13619151&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/v1op8vwF5UA&#038;color1=11645361&#038;color2=13619151&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/rabid-mad-attack-dog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Is Right</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/joe-is-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/joe-is-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrSingleton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[joe biden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wbOa989IRYw&#038;color1=11645361&#038;color2=13619151&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wbOa989IRYw&#038;color1=11645361&#038;color2=13619151&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/joe-is-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New on the unofficial Obama Video Music Box</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/new-on-the-unofficial-obama-video-music-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/new-on-the-unofficial-obama-video-music-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrSingleton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oVi4rUzf-0Q&#038;color1=11645361&#038;color2=13619151&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oVi4rUzf-0Q&#038;color1=11645361&#038;color2=13619151&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/new-on-the-unofficial-obama-video-music-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Ed Towns Out of Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/is-ed-towns-out-of-touch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/is-ed-towns-out-of-touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ed towns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being &#8220;out of touch&#8221; is such an ambiguous term.  What does it mean for a politician to be &#8220;out of touch.&#8221;  There&#8217;s no way that a representative can have a symbiotic relationship with all of their constituents.  Now, if &#8220;out of touch&#8221; means &#8220;hip&#8221; or &#8220;cool&#8221; then it raises the question whether [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being &#8220;out of touch&#8221; is such an ambiguous term.  What does it mean for a politician to be &#8220;out of touch.&#8221;  There&#8217;s no way that a representative can have a symbiotic relationship with all of their constituents.  Now, if &#8220;out of touch&#8221; means &#8220;hip&#8221; or &#8220;cool&#8221; then it raises the question whether we want our politicians to be &#8220;hip&#8221; or &#8220;cool.&#8221;  If we want &#8220;hip&#8221; or &#8220;cool&#8221; politicians then we should simply elect Kanye and Pharell and call it a day.  </p>
<p>What we do know after viewing his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mu7vKXV4PPk">News and Views</a> program is that Ed Towns is no <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=gil+noble+like+it+is&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=0&#038;oq=gil+noble">Gil Noble</a>.  The discussion taking place in this episode is a really important one, and it&#8217;s unfortunate that few people will make it through to the end.  There are legitimate concerns about the quality of health-care, and hospitals in particular in central brooklyn.  Towns&#8217; guest do an adequate job of relaying to him some of the struggles faced by residents in this district, notably egregious wait times when entering an emergency room.  </p>
<p>Towns appears to be listening to these two men speak, but will he do anything about it in Washington?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/is-ed-towns-out-of-touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Kevin Powell ad Blasts Towns&#8217;s Connection to Cigarette Industry</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/new-kevin-powell-ad-blasts-townss-connection-to-cigarette-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/new-kevin-powell-ad-blasts-townss-connection-to-cigarette-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ed towns]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[kevin powell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are not quite sure what to make of this ad.  On the one hand it clearly illustrates a consistent refrain from the Powell campaign that Ed Towns is an ineffective leader in the pocket of big business.  However, the message and footage seems a bit dated.  Public health is a major issue in central [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not quite sure what to make of this ad.  On the one hand it clearly illustrates a consistent refrain from the Powell campaign that Ed Towns is an ineffective leader in the pocket of big business.  However, the message and footage seems a bit dated.  Public health is a major issue in central Brooklyn, but how many Brooklynites would identify smoking as a major concern going into this campaign season?  </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8h8tlsUrXJM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8h8tlsUrXJM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/new-kevin-powell-ad-blasts-townss-connection-to-cigarette-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should John Edwards Hire Maury Povich?</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/should-john-edwards-hire-maury-povich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/should-john-edwards-hire-maury-povich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrSingleton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Funny]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[john edwards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sex scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#160;
Sometimes you have to dig deep to find something interesting to blog about, other times the stuff just falls right in your lap. Dude, John Ewards can&#8217;t be serious&#8230;
ABC NEWS:
John Edwards repeatedly lied during his Presidential campaign about an extramarital affair with a novice filmmaker, the former Senator admitted to ABC News today.
In an interview [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/12_03/edwardshunter_468x348.jpg" /></p>
<p class="break">&nbsp;</p>
<p><big>Sometimes you have to dig deep to find something interesting to blog about, other times the stuff just falls right in your lap. Dude, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5441195">John Ewards can&#8217;t be serious&#8230;</a></big></p>
<blockquote><p><i>ABC NEWS:</i><br />
John Edwards repeatedly lied during his Presidential campaign about an extramarital affair with a novice filmmaker, the former Senator admitted to ABC News today.</p>
<p>In an interview for broadcast tonight on Nightline, Edwards told ABC News correspondent Bob Woodruff he did have an affair with 44-year old Rielle Hunter, but said that he did not love her.</p>
<p>Edwards also denied he was the father of Hunter&#8217;s baby girl, Frances Quinn, although the one-time Democratic Presidential candidate said he has not taken a paternity test.</p>
<p>Edwards said he knew he was not the father based on timing of the baby&#8217;s birth on February 27, 2008. He said his affair ended too soon for him to have been the father.</p>
<p>A former campaign aide, Andrew Young, has said he was the father of the child.</p></blockquote>
<p>That last line there, as stated by this aide Young &#8212; can&#8217;t you just hear that being said by Maury Povich? Read it again Maury Povich style&#8230; &#8220;John, are your ready to hear your paternity test result? John Edwards&#8230; you ARE the father!&#8221;</p>
<p>Elizibeth Edwards apparently knew about his side piece back in 2006, but it&#8217;s unclear how much she knew, like if she was aware or not whether it was just a 2006 one-off or an ongoing jump-off.</p>
<p>Dude, remember, she&#8217;s slowly dying, and this is his way of sticking by her? Doing more sticking than she knew.</p>
<p>No more from me on this issue, you&#8217;ll be overloaded by the coverage as the weekend goes on. The most scandalous political news always comes out on a Friday. So juicy, watch to see if NBC ever cuts away from Olympic coverage to soak up some of the attention the other networks will be getting with this craziness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/should-john-edwards-hire-maury-povich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballots sold for crack?</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/ballots-sold-for-crack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/ballots-sold-for-crack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrSingleton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Voters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To what depths won&#8217;t folks sink in an election year? How easy is it for corrupt election handlers to get in bed with the likes of downtrodden drug addicts? It seems that in Alabama a desperate crack feind can apply for an absentee ballot for free and then turn it over for cash from underhanded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To what depths <i>won&#8217;t</i> folks sink in an election year? How easy is it for corrupt election handlers to get in bed with the likes of downtrodden drug addicts? It seems that in Alabama a desperate crack feind can apply for an absentee ballot <u>for free</u> and then turn it over for cash from underhanded election workers whose motive is to landslide a district for a single candidate. Alabama State Sec. Beth Chapman conducted an investigation and discovered that absentee ballots can go for about $40 cash or $40 worth of crack. Are election workers handing over crack rocks as well? Are you serious?</p>
<p>But wait, here&#8217;s the twist that&#8217;ll be a surprise to some but not to others &#8212; the whistleblower here, Sec. Chapman, is Republican and she&#8217;s alleging her fraud charges against the state&#8217;s Dems. This resurfaces the battle between the parties over voter requirements like multiple forms of ID. This was from last month&#8217;s NYTimes story, &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/us/10fraud.html">Officials Investigate 3 Alabama Counties in Voter Fraud Accusations</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>The accusations have larger national implications at a moment when many Republican officials around the country have cited rampant voter fraud as a justification for stricter identification requirements at the polls, a move that Democrats have said is really designed to dampen the turnout among Democratic voters.</p></blockquote>
<p>And here&#8217;s this week&#8217;s take from FOX:</p>
<p><center><embed type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src='http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf' id='mediumFlashEmbedded' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer' bgcolor='#000000' allowScriptAccess='always' allowFullScreen='true' quality='high' name='undefined' play='false' scale='noscale' menu='false' salign='LT' scriptAccess='always' wmode='false' height='275' width='305' flashvars='playerId=videolandingpage&#038;referralObject=2977428&#038;referralParentPlaylistId=14dd8d0f134b75c8565df1685e721eff8f003aac&#038;referralPlaylistId=c985e69916535a2170b2b18ab0ab7eb60401f9bb' /></embed></center></p>
<p class="break">&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>RELATED:</b> Last month I described voter fraud issues i this entry, &#8220;<a href="http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/07/voter-fraud-is-real/">Voter fraud is real</a>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/ballots-sold-for-crack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain Concedes Youth Vote</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/john-mccain-concedes-youth-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/john-mccain-concedes-youth-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[john mcc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When John McCain said a few weeks back that he would &#8220;rather lose a political campaign than lose a war,&#8221; it was easy to assume that Iraq was the only battle to which he was referring.  However, it is now becoming that embedded in that quote was McCain&#8217;s strategy for another battle in which he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When John McCain said a few weeks back that he would &#8220;rather lose a political campaign than lose a war,&#8221; it was easy to assume that Iraq was the only battle to which he was referring.  However, it is now becoming that embedded in that quote was McCain&#8217;s strategy for another battle in which he was engaged.  Rather than fight his general election opponent Barack Obama in the battle for the &#8220;youth vote,&#8221; McCain has instead opted to surrender.  Prior to surrendering in this contest to lure young voters, McCain as expected lit a series of fires to cover his tracks.  The first was the video ad produced by his campaign comparing Obama&#8217;s popularity to that of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton, and the second was accusing his opponent of playing &#8220;the race card.&#8221;  We won&#8217;t even discuss the &#8220;race card&#8221; comment because that term is so twentieth-century, which for millions of voters under 25 in this country might as well have been pre-historic era.  </p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s &#8220;Celebrity&#8221; video unmasked the perceptions that up to now his campaign had been doggedly trying to override, which is that McCain is a ornery old man who is out of touch with the American electorate.  He may not be out of touch in a great guy to get a beer with sense of the term, but definitely out of touch when it comes to things like computers, the internet, and presumably pop cultural references.  If McCain had been in tune with any of these things then he would have realized that while drawing maybe a few giggles from the senior set in Arizona, comparing Obama to Hilton and Spears is like comparing Dubya&#8217;s kids to soldiers, it just wouldn&#8217;t register.  </p>
<p>The other flawed element in McCain&#8217;s video is how in comparing Obama to America&#8217;s favorite damsels in dysfunction, McCain threw his own image and brand into comparison with Spears and Hilton, which is where it really gets ugly.  McCain&#8217;s staffers should have told him about something called &#8220;hateration,&#8221; which is what he was doing big time in his campaign ad&#8211;and few things are more reviled in this world than haters.  To put it in republican terms, &#8220;haters&#8221; are for the rest of the world what terrorists are for people whose mental alarms have been set by Karl Rove.  It would have been one thing for McCain to have produced &#8220;Celeb&#8221; if he had stayed clear of acting like a celebrity himself, but as the two clips below show, McCain has spent much of this campaign trying to get put on:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8TERMx3o0O4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8TERMx3o0O4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>and numero dos&#8230;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8xKgumSvPhg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8xKgumSvPhg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The McCain campaign&#8217;s personalized version of MTV Cribs and his appearance on talk shows like Jimmy Kimmel Live reveals the fact that he too has ambitions of becoming an American idol.  Ever since Bill Clinton&#8217;s breakout success with the MTV generation elite presidential candidates have been toeing the line between trying to be cool, without coming across as silly, or looking like the old dude at the party.  By making what amounts to a campaign version of a dis record, McCain&#8217;s camp has stooped to a level that neither of his recent peers would have dared.  He has tried turning the presidential campaign into a tabloid battle.  </p>
<p>Of course as they say in Hollywood the only bad press is no press.  McCain&#8217;s antics have made him the focal point of the newswire of late.  Ironically it was only a few weeks ago that McCain was being lauded for staying quiet as Obama scuttled around making pronouncements and responding to everything uttered.  Now it&#8217;s McCain who has caught a bad case of political foot in mouth syndrome.  Having essentially conceded the youth vote with his latest actions, it will be interesting to see what kind of base McCain aligns himself with moving forward.  </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/john-mccain-concedes-youth-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did you do with your STIMULUS check?</title>
		<link>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/what-did-you-do-with-your-stimulus-check/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/what-did-you-do-with-your-stimulus-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RP Staff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[a dream deferred]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stimulus check]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realpolitical.net/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to wonder where George Bush got the idea for the little blue check that was going to give the American economy a boost to make it through the next few months.  We could only imagine the sophomoric jokes snaking through the White House as Bush&#8217;s advisers discussed their prescription for this jolt of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to wonder where George Bush got the idea for the little blue check that was going to give the American economy a boost to make it through the next few months.  We could only imagine the sophomoric jokes snaking through the White House as Bush&#8217;s advisers discussed their prescription for this jolt of energy.  The stimulus check payments of 600 or 1200 dollars was to alleviate&#8211;or rather help us manage our economic dysfunction, but three months after the first batch of checks were distributed, the economy is having as hard of a time staying up as ever.  Going into this we all new that effects of the check was not going to last forever, but it surely would have carried us through the summer, right?</p>
<p>Now that August is here, kids will soon be going back to school thereby inducing shopping sprees that many retailers are hoping will help them stay afloat until Christmas.  For the rest of us, it&#8217;s another day, another dollar.</p>
<p>As you can tell we have money on our minds today here at RP and because we know you do to do, and are probably dying to vent, we&#8217;re giving you a platform.</p>
<p>Tuesday&#8217;s talking point is what happened to your stimulus check?</p>
<p>Did it dry up like a dream deferred?</p>
<p>Did you spend it all at the local store?</p>
<p>Or did you put in the bank and now your portfolio&#8217;s about to explode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realpolitical.net/2008/08/what-did-you-do-with-your-stimulus-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
